Kodak S100 EF Test Roll

Kodak S100 EFI picked up this late ’80s – early ‘90s fixed focus point-and-shoot at Goodwill for a few bucks late last summer. Since discovering that my son’s generic blue 35mm camera actually takes pretty cool and hipstery pictures, I decided to take a chance on romance and start picking up some more point-and-shoot and “trashcam” models.

TL;DR: This point-and-shoot takes pretty decent photos overall. Pretty sharp focus at midrange, some vignetting in certain situations. Feels comfortable to use. I kinda like it. I might experiment with the apertures a bit in the future.

Kodak S100 EF

(more…)

Spinning Self-Portrait

My son took his Lumix (the one Fake Aunt Sheryl gave him last year, along with the Team Umizoomi bag she made for it) to school for show and tell last week, and came back with several intriguing photos, including this one. Fun to see his classroom from his perspective — and to see his attempts at artsy photos.

He also came back with a camera lens that was cockeyed from a classmate obviously dropping it on the floor. Luckily, I was able to get it realigned with a little elbow grease, and my son still learned an important lesson about who you trust with your stuff.

Cosina CX-2 Test Roll

Cosina CX-2

I bought my Cosina CX-2 on eBay last spring for under $25 shipped. I’d been waiting for a decently priced one, especially since I overpaid through the nose for my Lomo LC-A back in 2004, and the Cosina CX-2 was purported to the THE camera that the LC-A was modeled from. I got this particular camera for a decent price — mostly because the seller was upfront that it needed new light seals.

Honestly, it’s not that bad. My Olympus XA has seals that don’t look much better, so I figured I’d take it out for a spin without doing any seal replacement (mostly because I’m still inexperienced at replacing light seals).

I was on the fence about the seals for a while, though, so I didn’t take the camera out for a test drive until September. I took the CX-2 for a walk to the new Middlegrounds Metropark in downtown Toledo, then finished off the roll that weekend.

Cosina CX-2 Test

(more…)

Mugging Out at the Playground

Cosina CX-2 Test
[Taken 1 October 2016]

This was the last frame from the maiden voyage of the Cosina CX-2, precursor to the Lomo LC-A. Expect an actual in-depth review sometime soon, but the tl;dr version is that Lomo did a pretty good job of copying this camera, for the most part, but the Cosina feels a bit more reliable.

I haven’t taken my Lomo for a spin for a good seven years or so, mainly because if I want a compact film camera that can be fully automatic, I’ll just take the Olympus XA — and I rarely want that high-contrast “Lomo” look about my photos these days. The Cosina, though… it has all the charm of my LC-A with none of the fuss. It might get some time to shine.

Three Imperial Cameras

Yes, I did. I bought three Imperial cameras in one trip to the antique mall last night, two of which are clearly identical but rebranded. The Chicago camera collective did plenty of that, but this is my first real example of it.

The two snapshot cameras take 620 film (i.e. 120 on a smaller spool) and the Lark takes 127 (aka Brownie) film. Both of those films are available nowadays, although the 127 is a bit more expensive, being that people don’t use Brownie snapshot cameras like they did some 60 years ago.

Looking forward to cleaning these up and testing them out!

Test Roll Preconceptions

I just loaded up my first motor-drive auto-load 35mm camera for tomorrow’s camera walk. Nikon OneTouch Zoom 70 AF, bought for $2 at Savers. It already has a few problems, though — mainly, it makes an unfortunate grinding noise when I press the shutter. The film advances, the counter changes digits, the flash fires… but that NOISE! It doesn’t sound like a normal shutter noise. It also doesn’t appear to focus when I depress the shutter halfway like it’s supposed to.

I looked up some reviews online — because, well, this camera was manufactured in the 1990s, so people were still buying it new from Costco in the early 2000s. People do not have nice things to say about this camera.

Then I looked up some more reviews of similar cameras. This camera is definitely not behaving the way I would expect it to. I’m seriously doubtful that any of these test photos will actually come out.

Now I’m starting to wonder which would be worse: wasting my last roll of 200 400-speed film by taking it out after 8 exposures and pitching it, or wasting my time plus $11 to get it developed if it comes back empty or blurry or otherwise unusable? Or do I go through with the test roll, on the off chance that it’s actually working as expected?

It’s going to be a beautiful day tomorrow. I’m going on a photo walk, whether it’s with this camera or another one. I’d just rather enjoy it and not feel like I’m potentially wasting not so much my time as my creative energy.

Yeah, I think I’m going to find another camera to load up for tomorrow. One that has a higher probability of turning out a successful roll of film. I’ll still finish the roll in the OneTouch Zoom, just not tomorrow. Maybe around the house or something.

* goes to camera collection shelf *

You know what? I haven’t used my Voigtlander Vitrona since I first tested it nearly eleven years ago. Now that I have a working light meter that can go onto the accessory shoe (and an iPhone app that can serve as backup if needed), I should be good to go.

* goes to deep freeze and check box o’ film *

Hmm. All I’m left with is some 800-speed, looooong-expired 64 and 25 speed Kodachrome slide film, and some black-and-white. The Kodachrome is a no-go, since my lab can’t process it, and I don’t want to waste a roll of 800 on a beautiful partly cloudy day (I save that for indoor events like weddings), so expired Tri-X 400-speed black-and-white it is!

Yes, I’ve already hit up Amazon to refresh my film supply.