“Christianity is a strong religion, based on faith and experience, and I don’t think that any discovery by archeologists will change that.” You just said a cotton-pickin’ mouthful.
I won’t touch the “strong religion, based on faith and experience” part, but I think that there are two ways to take the part about archaeological discoveries. If he means that irrefutable proof that Christ’s tomb was found would would not affect Christianity, then that’s idiotic: such proof would positively refute Christianity. But if he means that no archaeological guesswork two thousand years after the fact can constitute such proof, then that’s quite different.
I won’t touch the “strong religion, based on faith and experience” part, but I think that there are two ways to take the part about archaeological discoveries. If he means that irrefutable proof that Christ’s tomb was found would would not affect Christianity, then that’s idiotic: such proof would positively refute Christianity. But if he means that no archaeological guesswork two thousand years after the fact can constitute such proof, then that’s quite different.