[Taken 5 May 2002 | exposure unrecorded]
Walter Bura, 91, of Lakewood Ohio. Husband of the late Betsy (nee Hamlen); father of Peter, Elaine Eschbach and the late Christine Schnuth; grandfather of Megan, Alex, Natalie, Joseph Bura, Aaron, Matthew Schnuth, Nathan Eschbach; great grandfather of 2 passed away on August 2, 2010.
Looking back, I can easily remember the different phases of my childhood by where I lived, and with whom. Two chapters in particular are defined in my memory by my cousin Michael.
Funny how all it takes is one little query to get my genealogy-itch going again.
I recently got an e-mail from a previously-unknown cousin on my Memaw’s side of the family — my second cousin once removed, actually — giving me a piece of the Mickler family puzzle I hadn’t known before. This bit of information (that my great-grandfather was murdered, and that my Granny was a widow) spurred a week-long flurry of genealogical research on my part, culminating with my splurging on a month of Ancestry.com access.
I need to beware of losing focus, though: I have a tendency to just go searching online willy-nilly, instead of looking for a particular event or answering a particular question about a person or family. That’s when I burn out quickly, instead of maintaining my interest.
Another genealogy cousin of mine once said, back when I was in college and just getting into genealogy on my own, that I would understand in time how people get into and out of doing genealogy, and how the interest can ebb and flow. I do understand now, completely, and I’m taking full advantage of the genealogy bug having bitten for the moment.
[Taken 23 March 2010 | 1/5 sec @ f/2 | ISO 200 | Lensbaby 3G]
Just a little younger than I remember her…
More about Memaw (aka Jessie Mae Fay Mickler Taylor Cook Lowe) in my genealogy research.
The genealogical research show “Who Do You Think You Are?” premiered tonight at 8pm on NBC. I was tipped off about its existence not only by marketing e-mails from Ancestry.com, but also by the author of the companion book
On Megan’s Facebook fan page, she posted a poll: “Grade the opening episode of ‘Who Do you Think You Are?'” I rated it a B, and left the following comment:
There were very few things that rubbed me the wrong way about this episode; mostly, I enjoyed it.
First: I was always taught that the family name or surname is capitalized, not the given name. If the show is trying to encourage non-genealogists to start researching, the graphics should have reflected standard notation. (Unless I learned wrong.)
Second: I’m wondering if the entire series will be focused on finding “famous” or “influential” people in the subjects’ lineages. As a standard Heinz 57 American myself, I have no such expectation, and have only ever found one mildly notable person in my line. Of course, if they didn’t find someone interesting, and only found Average Joe Farmer back for generations, I suppose that wouldn’t make good television.
Third: Would a library really permit a patron to view an original document without gloves, and to point to it with a pencil tip while reading?
Apart from these small issues, I LOVED the show. I live in Ohio, and much of my family is from the Cincinnati area, so that was a pleasant surprise. I also appreciated the personal nature of the research, really getting into who these people were. It’s so easy sometimes to define our ancestors by their dates (hatched, matched, and dispatched), and the suspense of what happened to each ancestor, while sometimes excessive, was good television.
I’m very much looking forward to seeing the upcoming episodes! My own research has been sitting dormant for years; I expect that this will help rekindle my interest.
That said, I’ve already set my What’s On TV? iPhone app to remind me of next Friday’s episode. I’m also seriously considering making Friday night genealogy night.