dianaschnuth

According to my Research Log — which, incidentally, I nearly forgot even existed — I haven’t sent out any research requests since September of 2006. That’s over three years that my genealogy research has been sitting dormant.

I spent the evening going though our distant cousin’s research, comparing it to the census records I’d found online last night (and previously), and inputting some (but not all) of the information on the descendant report he sent. I hesitate to include another researcher’s information in my database without proof of documentation, since not all information sources are created equal. Still, when the data dovetails well enough with something I’ve already found elsewhere, I have no problem with including it… although I do make it my goal to get primary documentation for all of my dates and places and whatnot.

Tonight, I wrote a check to the Social Security Administration to get copies of the Social Security applications for Aaron’s Grandpa and Grandma Schnuth, and his Uncle Tom. I probably don’t really need Tom’s info, but I figured that the info was available, and I was requesting it for other family members, anyway, so I may as well pony up the extra cash to make my research more complete.

(The SS-5 includes a good amount of juicy details for the genealogist, including the individual’s name at the time of application, maiden name, mailing address, date and place of birth, father’s and mother’s names, race, gender, and employer — all written down by the person him/herself. It’s hard to get much more of a primary source than straight from the horse’s mouth.)

My goal is to fill in all the blanks in my research, now that I’ve gotten back one more generation via census records (and the research of others). I’m very close to making another generational connection, but it’s around the missing 1890 census… so I’ll focus on completeness before I try grasping at straws to get back one more generation.

My right hand is recovering from that peculiar hand cramp that comes from writing the word “Pennsylvania” about 20 times in a row — under “Place of birth of this person,” “Place of birth of Father of this person,” and “Place of birth of Mother of this person” for a family of eight in the 1900 U.S. Census. I could use ditto marks or arrows, sure, but that would make me a lax researcher, and we can’t have that.

I’m just now really digging into the data we received from a distant cousin of Aaron’s, back in January. If I thought that researching a relatively common name like Cook was bad (which it really isn’t, until people disappear and elope), I had no idea how challenging Schnuth research could be. Schnuth is such an uncommon name that there’s a good side and a bad side to researching it. The good: If two Schnuth families are living close to each other, you can bet dollars to doughnuts that they’re related. The bad: “Schnuth” gets misinterpreted as “Smith” (or misspelled as “Snuth”) so often that it totally offsets the awesome digital advances of the last 20 years of genealogy research (i.e. sitting at home, searching census indices in my jammies, versus spending an afternoon at the county library).

I’ve only just started double-checking the connection between Peter SCHNUTH (b. 1861) and Aaron’s great-grandfather James (b. ca. 1890/91), and I’ve found other branches of the family living in Pennsylvania that I just couldn’t resist documenting right away, before I forgot about them.

I get so caught up in research — connecting the dots, fitting the pieces together, drawing correlations — that it’s easy to let time slip by. Alas, I have training to attend at work tomorrow, so I need to get to bed so I can be fresh-faced and ready to go tomorrow morning. No marathon internet genealogy sessions like I used to do in my dorm room, years ago. Sigh.